Skip to main content

The Democratic Accountability of Central Banks

There is an interesting article in today's Daily Telegraph which argues that central banks around the world need to be less independent and more accountable to politicians (click here). The inflation targeting regime, which was popular over the past two decades, is no longer acceptable to governments who wish to monetise huge amounts of their debt (aka quantitative easing) as such regimes keep inflation too low.  Mervyn King, in a speech in Belfast last night, conceded that after 21 years, inflation targeting needs to be reassessed, but he thinks that to abandon it would be irresponsible. 
 
I have great concerns about placing monetary policy in the hands of non-accountable central banks or in the hands of politicians who will be tempted to use the monetary system for their own short-term ends. What is the solution? One possibility would be to return to a commodity-based monetary regime such as the Gold Standard. However, full-franchise democracies and commodity-based monetary regimes may be incompatible.
 
Click here to read Jeffrey Frankel's view on inflation targeting and the possibility of a return to the Gold Standard, which Frankel sees as a relic which should be left to gather dust.
 
   
 
 
 

Popular posts from this blog

The CEO: The Rise and Fall of Britain's Captains of Industry

Michael Aldous and I had our book The CEO: The Rise and Fall of Britain's Captains of Industry published a few weeks ago. You can find out more about it and buy it at Cambridge University Press's website . It is also available at Amazon , Waterstones , and Barnes & Noble .  The CEO has already been reviewed in The Sunday Times , The Observer and Financial Times .

The Railway Mania

My colleague and former PhD student Gareth Campbell has created a website about the British Railway Mania - click here . This episode has been described by the Economist as probably the greatest bubble in human history. Gareth's website provides background on the Mania and posits some explanations for the 'bubble'. In his explanation of why the bubble happened, Gareth places a lot of emphasis on investor myopia regarding future dividends and uncalled capital. His study of investors during the episode does not support the view that this episode was fuelled by naive and irrational investors. 

How Valuable Are Connections?

Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, Amir Kermani, James Kwak and Todd Mitton have written a paper on whether firms connected to Timothy Geithner benefited from these connections. They do so by looking at how stocks of these firms reacted to the announcement that he was a nominee for Treasury Secretary in November 2008. They find that there were large abnormal returns for connected firms. Below is the paper's abstract and the full paper is available here . The announcement of Timothy Geithner as nominee for Treasury Secretary in November 2008 produced a cumulative abnormal return for financial firms with which he had a connection. This return was about 6% after the first full day of trading and about 12% after ten trading days. There were subsequently abnormal negative returns for connected firms when news broke that Geithner's confirmation might be derailed by tax issues. Excess returns for connected firms may reflect the perceived impact of relying on the advice of a small ne...