Skip to main content

Deposits in Cyprus

It has become accepted policy that when banks collapse, depositors should not bear any losses. However, in the case of Cyprus, it appears that, as part of the country's bailout by the EU and IMF, depositors are being asked to take a haircut in the form of a levy on savings. This levy has just been rejected by the Cypriot parliament - story here.  The wider fear in the EU is that once the principle of depositor levies has been accepted, it makes banks in other weak economies susceptible to runs because depositors no longer believe that their deposits are 100% secure.

One reason why the levy has been proposed is that the EU is reluctant to bail out the foreign depositors of Cypriot banks.  It is reckoned that up to one half of deposits in Cypriot bank accounts are from Russia. According to a report in Der Speigel, a euro-zone bailout of Cypriot banks would mainly benefit Russian oligarchs, business-people, and gangsters (click here). Bailing out banks is a bad idea and simply increases risk taking and the probability of requiring a bailout in the first place. Depositors either need to be willing to take losses or require bank owners to be willing to provide funds in the case of a bank being unable to repay its depositors in full.

Popular posts from this blog

The CEO: The Rise and Fall of Britain's Captains of Industry

Michael Aldous and I had our book The CEO: The Rise and Fall of Britain's Captains of Industry published a few weeks ago. You can find out more about it and buy it at Cambridge University Press's website . It is also available at Amazon , Waterstones , and Barnes & Noble .  The CEO has already been reviewed in The Sunday Times , The Observer and Financial Times .

The Railway Mania

My colleague and former PhD student Gareth Campbell has created a website about the British Railway Mania - click here . This episode has been described by the Economist as probably the greatest bubble in human history. Gareth's website provides background on the Mania and posits some explanations for the 'bubble'. In his explanation of why the bubble happened, Gareth places a lot of emphasis on investor myopia regarding future dividends and uncalled capital. His study of investors during the episode does not support the view that this episode was fuelled by naive and irrational investors. 

How Valuable Are Connections?

Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, Amir Kermani, James Kwak and Todd Mitton have written a paper on whether firms connected to Timothy Geithner benefited from these connections. They do so by looking at how stocks of these firms reacted to the announcement that he was a nominee for Treasury Secretary in November 2008. They find that there were large abnormal returns for connected firms. Below is the paper's abstract and the full paper is available here . The announcement of Timothy Geithner as nominee for Treasury Secretary in November 2008 produced a cumulative abnormal return for financial firms with which he had a connection. This return was about 6% after the first full day of trading and about 12% after ten trading days. There were subsequently abnormal negative returns for connected firms when news broke that Geithner's confirmation might be derailed by tax issues. Excess returns for connected firms may reflect the perceived impact of relying on the advice of a small ne...